cover letter sample

cover letter example

July 15, 2007 at 5:13 pm Leave a comment

Citando a la wikipedia

Supongo que como todo el mundo antes o despues hemos ido a parar a la wikipedia. Sin duda uno de los grandes desafios de la inteligencia/creación colectiva, de los movimientos por una cultura libre y del moviento copyleft.

Pues llegado a este punto a uno le surge la duda como debe citarse una página en la wikipedia, pues segun ellos mismos uno debe (o puede) seguir unas ciertas pautas. Para los amantes de BibTeX (como yo) proponen una plantilla como la que sigue.

BibTeX entry

 

@misc{ wiki:###,
   author = "Wikipedia",
   title = "Plagiarism --- {W}ikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
   year = "2004",
   url = "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plagiarism&oldid=5139350",
   note = "[Online; accessed 22-July-2004]"
 }

When using the LaTeX package url (\usepackage{url} somewhere in the preamble) which tends to give much more nicely formatted web addresses, the following may be preferred:

@misc{ wiki:###,
   author = "Wikipedia",
   title = "Plagiarism --- {W}ikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
   year = "2004",
   url = "url{http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plagiarism&oldid=5139350}",
   note = "[Online; accessed 22-July-2004]"
 }

Pero Jimmy Wales opina algo sorprendete

"Do you think students and researchers should cite Wikipedia?"

"No, I don't think people should cite it, and I don't think people should cite Britannica, either — the error rate there isn't very good. People shouldn't be citing encyclopedias in the first place. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias should be solid enough to give good, solid background information to inform your studies for a deeper level. And really, it's more reliable to read Wikipedia for background than to read random Web pages on the Internet."

Aquí queda eso, quien quiera entender que entienda.

May 17, 2006 at 2:09 am Leave a comment


Historias

En aquel momento aun no sabiamos que todo estaba interconectado.

Mi delicious